Cost-effectiveness and cost–utility analysis of a work-place smoking cessation intervention with and without financial incentives
Saved in:
van den Brand, F.A., et al., Cost-effectiveness and cost–utility analysis of a work-place smoking cessation intervention with and without financial incentives. Addiction, vol. 115, n. 3, 2020, p. 534-545.
Ref.
573539
Location:
SIIS Archivo (R.696)
Palabras clave:
Drogodependencias, Tabaquismo, Entorno laboral, Programas de desintoxicación, Intervención, Asignación económica, Efectos, Abstinencia, Análisis coste eficacia, Servicios de salud, Entorno familiar, Evaluación de servicios, Datos estadísticos, Estudio comparativo, Países Bajos
Drogodependencias, Tabaquismo, Entorno laboral, Programas de desintoxicación, Intervención, Asignación económica, Efectos, Abstinencia, Análisis coste eficacia, Servicios de salud, Entorno familiar, Evaluación de servicios, Datos estadísticos, Estudio comparativo, Países Bajos
Similar Items: Cost-effectiveness and cost–utility analysis of a work-place smoking cessation intervention with and without financial incentives
- Are financial incentives cost-effective to support smoking cessation during pregnancy?
- The cost-effectiveness of three smoking cessation programs
- Incentives for smoking cessation (Review)
- The costs of smoking and the cost effectiveness of smoking-cessation programs
- USING INCENTIVES, LOTTERIES, AND COMPETITIONS IN WORK-SITE SMOKING CESSATION INTERVENTIONS
- THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PRIZE-BASED AND VOUCHER-BASED CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT IN A POPULATION OF COCAINE- OR OPIOID-DEPENDENT OUTPATIENTS